Skip to main content

Table 6 Probabilities of selecting alternatives for different simulated scenarios

From: Preferences in adolescents and young people’s sexual and reproductive health services in Nigeria: a discrete choice experiment

Scenarios

Health Facility 1

Health Facility 2

Neither

Probability (CI)

Probability (CI)

Probability (CI)

Base uptake

0.521 (0.511 – 0.532)

0.437 (0.427 – 0.448)

0.420 (0.360 – 0.4.70)

Cost = $10, alternative 1

0.429 (0.396 – 0.468)

0.488 (0.459 – 0.514)

0.083 (0.067 – 0.100)

Time = 2 h, alternative 1

0.425 (0.396 – 0.454)

0.491 (0.466 – 0.517)

0.083 (0.069 – 0.101)

Cost = $10, alternative 2

0.568 (0.534 – 0.597)

0.352 (0.316 – 0.393)

0.081 (0.067 – 0.097)

Time = 2 h, alternative 2

0.571 (0.546 – 0.593)

0.348 (0.322 – 0.376)

0.081 (0.068 – 0.098)

Best scenario (alternative 1)

0.797 (0.768 – 0.823)

0.173 (0.150 – 0.200)

0.029 (0.025 – 0.035)

Best scenario (alternative 2)

0.228 (0.199 – 0.259)

0.739 (0.705 – 0.770)

0.033 (0.028 – 0.039)

Worst scenario (alternative 2)

0.575 (0.551 – 0.596)

0.343 (0.316 – 0.371)

0.082 (0.068 – 0.099)

Worst scenario (alternative 1)

0.420 (0.395 – 0.446)

0.496 (0.476 – 0.512)

0.084 (0.070 – 0.102)

Validation choice task

0.744 (0.738 – 0.750)

0.241 (23.5 – 0.247)

0.150 (0.140 – 0.170)

  1. CI Confidence interval